Probably me. There was nothing to do at work today - except obsessively visit and revisit various blogs that had not updated, in a never-expanding circle of futility.
I was at work to 9.00 - I was doing the late shift. Though I would have switched off about 8.55. Not sure if your tracker is working on Sydney time (I don't think mine's on Melbourne time).
I check what google searches people do to link to me, and what sites link to me, but I'm not so interested in stats or traffic or that sort of thing. Maybe I should be? Who knows.
I have a couple of favourite searches from my current crop - merkin poem "merkin poetry" and did i mention that i adore sleeping. The second one is terribly me.
22 comments:
Probably me. There was nothing to do at work today - except obsessively visit and revisit various blogs that had not updated, in a never-expanding circle of futility.
Ah. I do that sometimes.
Is that a hint that maybe I should update more?
Not really. I'm still a bit surprised if it did reach 22. Maybe there's some other Nailpolishblues at MM, my place of work. (Hi there folks!)
But look, I'm doing it again... at home.
Oh, I guessed your work place! Pretty obvious though.
I counted 22. Stats are fun.
I do that all the time when I'm at work too. I've tried to stop myself, but I can't help it.
I never check who / when / how many times anyone has clicked into my blog.
Never ever.
Why do bloggers look at that data?
I could make an attempt to best the current record of 22.
No promises, but I could try.
Won't help your stats though, only the first visit is counted.
Caz, I like to make sure that I am the only person from my workplace... Also, some of the searches are hysterical.
I don't think it was Tim - it was up until about 9-9.30. Piqued my curiosity is all.
Colonel - that's me today!
I was at work to 9.00 - I was doing the late shift. Though I would have switched off about 8.55. Not sure if your tracker is working on Sydney time (I don't think mine's on Melbourne time).
I check what google searches people do to link to me, and what sites link to me, but I'm not so interested in stats or traffic or that sort of thing. Maybe I should be? Who knows.
It works on Sydney time. I changed it because it was confusing me.
If you're interested then you're interested if you're not then who cares? Individual inclination is the rule in my book.
After the last post, I'd say it was a guy.
Phish, I believe that Tim is a guy. Don't think he's all that interested in my boobs though.
Ah, the fine line between flattery and stalking.
Being 22 was better than 21. Being 26 is better than being 22!
I shall assume flattery. I can't imagine that Tim would stalk me.
Mind you, on re-count it was twenty-three. Freaky.
I have found the twenties [and the late teens] all pretty samey, Mish, I suspect that's because I'm stuck in a ridiculously prolonged adolescence.
True, true, search terms can be a hoot, but the good ones tend to be few and far between. I should feel motivated to look, on the off chance.
You can find all links to your blog from:
http://wholinkstome.com/
Sure saves time!
I have a couple of favourite searches from my current crop - merkin poem "merkin poetry" and did i mention that i adore sleeping. The second one is terribly me.
I don't think you ever posted a merkin poem here??? You seem to have appropriated google searches for my merkin poem, dammit!
Maybe I should use the slogan, "I came twenty-two times in one day."
Actually, that sounds stupid and pimpish and I sort of wish I never suggested that....
It would work if you're a porn star Timmy, but otherwise, no one would believe you.
Nowadays, thanks to CGI and the special effects industry, porn stars may suffer no longer! Technology: saving porn stars from sexhaustion...
That would be the jurisdiction of Viagra, rather than CGI.
Only a boy could even think of coming 22 times in one day before 10am on a Sunday.
You know, Tim, the more times you mention merkin poem...maybe you should stop now, yeah?
Need to round it up to 22 comments.
There.
Isn't that better?
Post a Comment